Update on an Additional Word on the Aeth

Update

On An Additional Word On The Aether

This is an expose of Ken Wheeler and his knowingly pushing a propaganda agenda. I thought he was just supporting this ideology out there out of ignorance, but I've recently discovered that may not be the truth. Now I know there is still an active organized effort happening to keep Tesla's technology suppressed, and this may be proof of that. I think it is, but you can be the judge if you still think he is doing this out of ignorance, or not. I'm just showing you the evidence.... And for those of you that think I'm just crying about nothing, I don't believe I am. This is important stuff, it's keeping us from Tesla's dream, a world that could be right instead of the corrupt world we are living in. These people need to wake up and stop; holding this back from the world.

There is a copy of the text from the source that he is reading from below the video. Pay close attention to what is left out.......

At 2:18 “It is true,” said Mr. Tesla, “that many scientific minds envisaged the theory of a gaseous ether, but it was rejected again and again because in such a medium longitudinal waves would be propagated with infinite velocity. Lord Kelvin conceived the so-called contractile ether, possessing properties which would result in a finite velocity of longitudinal waves. In 1885, however, an academic dissertation was published by Professor De Volson Wood, an American, at a Hoboken institution, which dealt with a gaseous ether in which the elasticity, density and specific heat were determined with rare academic elegance. But, so far, everything pertaining to the subject was purely theoretical.

What, then, can light be if it is not a transverse vibration? That was the question he asked himself and set out to find the answer.

At 2:45 “I consider this extremely important,” said Mr. Tesla. “Light cannot be anything else but a longitudinal disturbance in the ether, involving alternate compressions and rarefactions. In other words, light can be nothing else than a sound wave in the ether.”

At 7:30 This appears clearly, Mr. Tesla explained, if it is first realized that, there being no Maxwellian ether, there can be no transverse oscillation in the medium. The Newtonian theory, he believes, is in error, because it falls entirely in not being able to explain how a small candle can project particles with the same speed as the blazing sun, which has an immensely higher temperature.

HE SKIPS THIS PART “We have made sure by experiment,” said Mr. Tesla, “that light propagates with the same velocity irrespective of the character of the source. Such constancy of velocity can only be explained by assuming that it is dependent solely on the physical properties of the medium, especially density and elastic force.

Micro-Wave Possibilities.

At 9:10 Coming now to the wireless waves, it is still true that they are of the same character as light waves, only they are not transversal. As a matter of fact, radio transmitters emit nothing else but sound waves in the ether, and if the experts will realize this they will find it very much easier to explain the curious observations made in the application of these waves.

So why does he skip this part?

“We have made sure by experiment,” said Mr. Tesla, “that light propagates with the same velocity irrespective of the character of the source. Such constancy of velocity can only be explained by assuming that it is dependent solely on the physical properties of the medium, especially density and elastic force."

He couldn't read that part because it goes against what he tells everyone about all the greats in early electricity, that non of them believed in particles involved with the aether and electricity. So we now know that he knows he is lying

I'd like to talk about the information source, I think this needs to be considered when researching Tesla. It's by Orrin E. Dunlap Jr., New York Times, on April 8th, 1934, when Tesla was 77 years old.

This is not what I would call one of the best sources because it's a reporter, and not something Tesla wrote himself. But also I think Ken could be taking what he says the wrong way.

I think the best source of information about Tesla comes from his patents.

Then from his lectures, which he would have written.

And last, from reporters, because we don't know if they understood what Tesla was saying, or that they quoted him right.

But even at all of that, Ken has shown his hand by the part that he left out. That is very telling. “We have made sure by experiment,” said Mr. Tesla, “that light propagates with the same velocity irrespective of the character of the source. Such constancy of velocity can only be explained by assuming that it is dependent solely on the physical properties of the medium, especially density and elastic force."

I think he left it out because it doesn't support his idea that the aether and fields are nothing, not matter related. And that means he is not looking for the truth here, he is just pushing his view, and not what these men really believed.

The source for the information below: https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/articles/tesla-sees-evidence-radio-and-light-are-sound

Unique