Steimetz The Other Confusionest | Teslatechexplained

Lats updated on: 12/09/2021

Steinmetz The Other Confusionist

Unique hits

This was a doc in The Real Tesla Group Seeking the Truth not the Propaganda

DAVID MONROE·TUESDAY, OCTOBER 13, 2020

This is some of the proof that Steinmetz was a confusionist just like Tesla told the FBI that Einstein was.
Note:This post was updated on 02/26/2020

At 0:52 into this video look at the picture and tell me who is standing next to Steinmetz? Einstein, as Tesla called him the "confusionist"..... Hmmmm, and no Tesla to be found. That is telling in and of itself that Einstein is in this picture with Steinmetz.
https://youtu.be/caPs-XYGTzY?t=52

In watching this video I noticed something. Why is the term impedance never used? So I looked it up. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/impedance

First used in 1886 and take a guess what other word was first used in 1886? Inductance! Hmmmm!

Conductance....was first used in 1885, Hmmmm again! https://www.merriam-webster.com/time-traveler/1885

If Steinmetz was such a smart man, why does he never use the term IMPEDANCE? After all, the problems they were having, was impedance mismatches, and if Steinmetz would have used that term, it would explain where these IMPULSES were coming from, wouldn't it?

****************************
https://www.facebook.com/groups/therealteslagroup/permalink/969078950160190/
This is from a post I did at the link above:

At 13:07 he says there is energy stored in the load? REALLY? I thought that was energy CONSUMED? Someone correct me if I am wrong but that is total BS.

Why is it that no one else has pointed out the errors presented in Steinmetz work?

This is critical to understand WHAT IS BLINDING EVERYONE.

At 12:17 read what it says and what the lady is saying. They are talking about a flow of power, THAT IS NOT STATIC CHARGE.

It says "While electric power flows over the line A, there is a magnetic field surrounding the line conductors, and an electrostatic field issuing from the line conductors. The magnetic field and the electrostatic, or "dielectric" field represent stored energy."

Now I ask everyone, what is wrong with that statement?

If you have power flowing and a magnetic field, THEN THE ELECTRIC FIELD IS NOT STATIC, IT IS DYNAMIC!

NOTE: Added 12/02/2021

Hence the very name of the science ELECTRODYNAMICS, a branch of physics.

e·lec·tro·dy·nam·ics

(ĭ-lĕk′trō-dī-năm′ĭks)

The scientific study of electric charges, electric currents, and the forces associated with them. Electrodynamics is a branch of physics.

The American Heritage® Student Science Dictionary, Second Edition. Copyright © 2014 by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. All rights reserved.

End Added 12/02/2021

By using the term dielectric you are completely ignoring the FACT that there are different electric fields.

There are actually 3 different types of electric fields (that I know of as of right now).
There are:
1. Static (charge separation)
2, Dynamic (flowing thru time/current)
3. Kinetic Tesla’s (Oscillator, stationary in time/no current)

But according to Tom Bearden oscillator is static.

The proper term for the 3rd one should be oscillatory, not static. I would go with Tesla because of his quote on the aether, if it is static our hopes are in vain, but if kinetic, which we know that it is, then it is a matter of time before we will run our machines on the wheel work of nature. (I'm paraphrasing)

We have to consider the fact that Tom tells us he has been threatened, so he may have been told to say static, when he knows it's kinetic/oscillatory?

To all of you people out there using the TERM dielectric for the electric field, here is your proof that that is an improper term. There was no reason to call the electric field DIELECTRIC, and everyone out there using that term has a different definition for the term. You have an electric field, when it is flowing thru time it creates a magnetic field and is then called ELECTRICITY.

I challenge everyone to find a definition for dielectric that is an electric field. It's been over 100 years now since Steinmetz started using that term, and there was no reason for it. Just listen to the people using it, they are all over the board because it has never been properly defined as an electric field, and you can see where he started using it. The only reason I can see for it being used like that was he is purposefully trying to confuse people.

But there is more proof that Steinmetz was a confusionist, and part of the massive cover up of both Maxwell's and Tesla's work.

This image is nothing other than an Illuminati symbol of the Owl from The Bohemian Grove. In the Bible it's called Molek, a god that they sacrificed children to. (Sick)

Now lets look at the end of the video at 49:53 her summary of the image of the electric and magnetic fields If the video does not start at the right time, click here.

At 52:24 I would like to make a point. As I showed in my post, that was about the first time Steinmetz uses the term dielectric, and he is calling it electrostatic. Yet this lady is setting here with this labeled as the dielectric and magnetic fields. NO WERE IN THIS VIDEO HAVE I HERD HIM, OR HER, SAY ANYTHING ABOUT A DYNAMIC ELECTRIC FIELD,

My point is that you will never have the magnetic field expressed by a electrostatic field, yet every time they say dielectric you are going to think of a static electric field. WHY IS HE DOING THIS?

Also note, that she says both the lines are running the same way. Now AC or DC that is just not correct. That image is nothing more than the Owl from Bohemian Grove. It is an Illuminati symbol.

It's simple! Tesla was calling the aether kinetic and Steinmetz was working with a "confusionist" (Einstein) to make sure you would go down a dead end road and never be able to understand what Tesla was talking about. He couldn't use the proper term impedance, because then the mystery would be gone about the impulses they were having on the lines. He didn't want anyone to understand what standing waves were, or how they were created. He also had to get rid of the idea of plus and minus charges, and that put the nail in the coffin for anyone to ever be able to understand WHAT THE AETHER IS. It works thru the principles of wave superposition, AND SO DOES RESONANCE!

Stan Meyers gave you the clue, when he said the voltage would increase to infinity, limited only by the equipment, but no one can understand that. I not only understand it, but I demonstrate it using the wave on a string app. You can see my proof of that in this video: https://youtu.be/Gb47gDeVRyg

I also demonstrate the real meaning of the 3,6, n 9 as you can see in this video: https://youtu.be/TVuU5Z5ZBzA

Steinmetz has also gotten everyone blinded to ENERGY STORAGE because standing waves store every cycle pumped into them unlike this noise filled dirty electricity that we are using today which IS NOT ENERGY STORAGE as he continually pumps into your head. See my video on that: https://youtu.be/LwZ5WdGVxMY

Steinmetz was a "confusionist" just like Einstein was. The proof is in the picture at the start of the video, and in the picture at the top of this post.

New updated information Added 12/09/2021

Before I finish this update, I'd like to get some feed back about the information below. My point here was that Steinmetz was a confusionist, so please, watch the two videos below. If Steinmetz was not a confusionist, then these two people should be on the same page, right? If you still are not convinced, I can find more information about how people have different ideas about what a dielectric field is.

I really like her work here, but I think that the aether is separated when current is flowing. And we need to see some real iron shavings around that loop of wire, not just a drawing of them.

So one of them says those lines on the screen above are the magnetic field lines and one says they are not....... There's no confusion there, is there?

So what is this that I have been talking about, the Illuminati and Bohemian Grove, and what does it have to do with an Owl? It's a place where every summer the rich and powerful from around the world gather. Watch the video below, I dare you..

Sorry about that, I thought if you clicked on the play button, bottom right hand side, it would take you to the video, BUT IT DOES NOT. I've had a lot of battles with YouTube, so I have this age restricted. For now I'll leave it in the video player because I may change the listing? For now, CLICK ON "Watch on YouTube" link right under "Learn more" or, JUST CLICK HERE or the link below:

https://youtu.be/ZCjDTGI7E_Y