An Additional word on the Aether

Last update: 12/20/2021 Click here to go to the update

An Additional Word on the Aether

This was doc in The Real Tesla Group Seeking the Truth not the Propaganda.

David Monroe·Sunday, October 11, 2020·

This is not The Aether Defined Part 2, this is a post to make clear what Maxwell and Tesla really believed, as apposed to what some people are saying out there.

I wish to set straight an idea that is being pushed out there because it is blinding people from the truth. Many of you reading this may be offended by the contents of this post. All I can say is this is the truth not my opinion.

But before I get to the documentation of the truth about what Maxwell and Tesla believed about the aether, I’d like to say something about induction and action at a distance.

Take two of those DC motors from the dollar store that are those hand held fans, and wire the two motors together. Now turn the blade on one of them, and the blade on the other one will match the one you are turning. Turn it 1/2 a turn and the other one will match it, instantaneously. That is the spooky action at a distance. Academics have gone off on a fairy tale because they don’t accept that an aether exist.

The facts are that the early people of electricity, and I’m talking the main two, Maxwell and Tesla. They didn’t have the knowledge that we have today, but they believed electricity and the aether are matter related. We just call them particles today, but these men did not believe in fields of nothing.

What happens with the two DC motors when you wire them together with a conductor is that the conductor between the two alters the aether around the wires. It polarizes the surrounding aether to the magnets the the wires are connected to. In this way electricity is being generated in one location and providing an aetheric movement in a remote location. I have shown clear proof in my post “The Aether Defined”.

Note added Oct, 14/2020 Standing waves are already connecting everything in the universe, and they are like a two way communications network. Look at them like a ski lift that takes you up the side of a mountain. When they turn it on at the bottom of the mountain, don’t the chairs at the top of the mountain move instantaneously with the chairs at the bottom of the mountain? Look at it like that.

To the heart of this post.

From ResearchGate Displacement Current and the Electrotonic State

In Part II of his 1861 paper “On Physical Lines of Force”, Maxwell introduced the electromagnetic momentum A, which accounts for Faraday’s electrotonic state [1]. It will be proposed that this vector A actually is Maxwell’s displacement current, because when we derive the electromagnetic wave equation, we are working on the premises that E will equal −∂A/∂t as per Faraday’s law. The vector A would then simply be a special case of J for the circumstances that exist in wireless electromagnetic radiation in deep space. Those circumstances would of course require the existence of an actual electric current everywhere in space where electromagnetic radiation exists, which is more or less what Maxwell proposed in his 1861 paper in the form of his sea of molecular vortices. Maxwell’s proposal regarding the sea of vortices was however rejected, yet ironically his displacement current has been retained in modern physics with its meaning altered so as to render it into a virtual current.

On Physical Lines of Force (1861)
by James Clerk Maxwell

Thus if we strew iron filings on paper near a magnet, each filing will be magnetized by induction, and the consecutive filings will unite by their opposite poles, so as to form fibres, and these fibres will indicate the direction of the lines of force. The beautiful illustration of the presence of magnetic force afforded by this experiment, naturally tends to make us think of the lines of force as something real, and as indicating something more than the mere resultant of two forces, whose seat of action is at a distance, and which do not exist there at all until a magnet is placed in that part of the field. We are dissatisfied with the explanation founded on the hypothesis of attractive and repellent forces directed towards the magnetic poles, even though we may have satisfied ourselves that the phenomenon is in strict accordance with that hypothesis, and we cannot help thinking that in every place where we find these lines of force, some physical state or action must exist in sufficient energy to produce the actual phenomena. My object in this paper is to clear the way for speculation in this direction, by investigating the mechanical results of certain states of tension and motion in a medium, and comparing these with the observed phenomena of magnetism and electricity. By pointing out the mechanical consequences of such hypotheses, I hope to be of some use to those who consider the phenomena as due to the action of a medium, but are in doubt as to the relation of this hypothesis to the experimental laws already established, which have generally been expressed in the language of other hypotheses.

I have in a former paper[1] endeavored to lay before the mind of the geometer a clear conception of the relation of the lines of force to the space in which they are traced. By making use of the conception of currents in a fluid, I showed how to draw lines of force, which should indicate by their number the amount of force, so that each line may be called a unit-line of force (see Faraday's `Researches,' 3122); and I have investigated the path of the lines where they pass from one medium to another.

In the same paper I have found the geometrical significance of the "Electrotonic State," and have shown how to deduce the mathematical relations between the electrotonic state, magnetism, electric currents, and the electromotive force, using mechanical illustrations to assist the imagination, but not to account for the phenomena.

I propose now to examine magnetic phenomena from a mechanical point of view, and to determine what tensions in, or motions of, a medium are capable of producing the mechanical phenomena observed. If, by the same hypothesis, we can connect the phenomena of magnetic attraction with electromagnetic phenomena and with those of induced currents, we shall have found a theory which, if not true, can only be proved to be erroneous by experiments which will greatly enlarge our knowledge of this part of physics.

Additional resource for the above click here.

You can read more of it at the link above, but it’s clear that he believed in a particle, or the aether as being something real, of the physical world. There is a particle associated with the aether that is what electrical current is.

Continuing in Part 2 of Maxwell’s 1861 paper we read:

The only conception which has at all aided me in conceiving of this kind of motion is that of the vortices being separated by a layer of particles, revolving each on its own axis in the opposite direction to that of the vortices, so that the contiguous surfaces of the particles and of the vortices have the same motion.

In mechanism, when two wheels are intended to revolve in the same direction, a wheel is placed between them so as to be in gear with both, and this wheel is called an "idle wheel." The hypothesis about the vortices which I have to suggest is that a layer of particles, acting as idle wheels, is interposed between each vortex and the next, so that each vortex has a tendency to make the neighbouring vortices revolve in the same direction with itself.

In mechanism, the idle wheel is generally made to rotate about a fixed axle; but in epicyclic trains and other contrivances, as, for instance, in Siemens's governor for steam-engines[5], we find idle wheels whose centres are capable of motion. In all these cases the motion of the centre is the half sum of the motions of the circumferences of the wheels between which it is placed. Let us examine the relations which must subsist between the motions of our vortices and those of the layer of particles interposed as idle wheels between them.

Prop. IV. — To determine the motion of a layer of particles separating two vortices.

Let the circumferential velocity of a vortex, multiplied by the three direction-cosines of its axis respectively, be α, β, γ, as in Prop. II. Let l, m, n be the direction-cosines of the normal to any part of the surface of this vortex, the outside of the surface being regarded positive. Then the components of the velocity of the particles of the vortex at this part of its surface will be (sorry, the math symbols didn’t copy over, see the link) If this portion of the surface be in contact with another vortex whose velocities are α ′ , β ′ , γ ′ {\displaystyle \alpha ',\beta ',\gamma '} 📷, then a layer of very small particles placed between them will have a velocity which will be the mean of the superficial velocities of the vortices which they separate, so that if u {\displaystyle u} 📷 is the velocity of the particles in the direction of x {\displaystyle x} 📷, since the normal to the second vortex is in the opposite direction to that of the first.

I think it’s safe to say that Maxwell believed that particles were involved with electricity and the aether.

What does Tesla have to say?

You can see what Tesla thought about the aether in my post "The Aether Defined"

From Nikola Tesla U.S. Patent 685,957 - Apparatus for the Utilization of Radiant Energy

APPARATUS FOR THE UTILIZATION OF RADIANT ENERGY.

SPECIFICATION forming part of Letters Patent No. 685,957 dated November 5, 1901.

Application filed March 21, 1901. Serial No. 52,153. (No model.)

"My own experiments and observations, however, lead me to conclusions more in accord with the theory heretofore advanced by me that sources of such radiant energy throw off with great velocity minute particles of matter which are strongly electrified, and therefore capable of charging an electrical conductor, or, even if not so, may at any rate discharge an electrified conductor either by carrying off bodily its charge or otherwise."

Are these particles Tesla is talking about here particles that just have not paired up with another one, where the particles are spinning in the opposite direction? In that note I purpose that the aether is a sea of neutrinos that are two particles spinning in opposite directions that forms vortices that are neutral in charge. Hence neutrinos are aetherions.

And is this another coincidence that in standing waves you have forces, or particle spins going in opposite directions? I think I have another one to add to the list I’m working on.

Note added 12/20/2021 Below I am picking on Ken for a number of reasons, one is because he parrots a lot of things that are blinding people, and secondly because he says straight out in his video to tell him what you think, good bad or indifferent. So that's what I'm doing. End note added 12/20/2021

One last point I would like to make here.
People need to realize, that Ken Wheeler says things he wants to believe, and not what the facts are. I really get tired of him saying that all the people involved with the development of electricity DID NOT BELIEVE IN PARTICLES associated with electricity. In fact, Ken believes the very same thing he puts academia down for, and that is the disbelief in particles associated with electricity. I mean what is the difference between what Ken believes and their virtual particles? He likes to think high of himself, but I don’t think I would trust his interpretations of some stuff he says he has translated. Like the bias he puts on what people believed electricity is, he is probably just telling you what he wants those translations to say. Ken loses all credibility with me!

NOTE added 11/11/2021

"Throughout space there is energy. Is this energy static or kinetic! If static our hopes are in vain; if kinetic — and this we know it is, for certain — then it is a mere question of time when men will succeed in attaching their machinery to the very wheelwork of nature. – Nikola Tesla

If Ken is so smart, then tell me how you can have kinetic energy WITHOUT MATTER? That is one of Tesla's most famous quotes. If he hasn't heard it before then he isn't a very good researcher, and if he has, then he is flat out lying to everyone. Either way, he is not as smart as he would like everyone to believe, that's for sure.

End information added.

I’m sorry if that offends some of you, I’m just showing you the facts.

I’m really getting tired of people leaving comments with another video of Ken Wheeler, and telling me I’m wrong and to listen to ken. The facts are that he has a lot of people listening to him, AND HE DOESN’T KNOW WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT. I just proved that! Remember these facts the next time you are listening to Ken Wheeler blab on about how all of the people that developed electricity didn’t believe particles associated with it. Now you know he just says things he wants to believe, not what the facts are.

12/20/2021 update

Note added Oct.12/2020 Listen to what he says here at 12:32 into the video, “everything is fields, and fields are not particles too”. Listen to 12:48 https://youtu.be/8EJCpbpN6dk?t=725 Has he even read some of Tesla’s or Maxwell’s work? So he just defined fields as the aether, and fields he just said were not particles (back the video up a little more). That’s what is called circular reasoning. Remember this the next time you listen to Ken going on and on about what Tesla and Maxwell believed. And please read my document “The Aether Defined” (link above), I don’t think Ken has read what they say. (On the original note of The Aether Defined, someone left me a link for a video of Ken defining the aether and in the comment they said this was the real aether defined..... LOL he never defines anything. Just saying)

Note added 01/31/2021 https://youtu.be/KooPsEE7E-Q?list=PLhIq_lD8WlnWab-1BonsCUeuZWXvkdqhD&t=386 (NOTE: if the video below doesn't start at the right time, click the link here) Here at about 6:50 into the video Ken is saying that Tesla and all these people that developed electricity did not believe the electron was a particle. You just read what Tesla says about electricity. Ken just says what he wants to believe or he doesn’t understand what he reads?

II’m sure there may be something I had in my head that I didn’t say, so when I add stuff that is significant, I always make note of the change or additional information added. So if you liked the information in this note, now a document, please like the page by clicking here, and like my page.

NOTE: Update 11/09/2021

I'm not sure I gave this post the right name? It's more of a post that makes the point about what Maxwell and Tesla believed about the aether. It's really more of an attach on Ken Wheeler, even though he's not the only one spreading the disinformation about the aether.

These are really the same people that are saying things like counter space, dielectric when they are really talking about the electric field (NOTE: I challenge anyone to find d definition for dielectric that is talking about an electric field, IT'S AN ELECTRICAL NON CONDUCING MATERIAL). The same people saying time doesn't exist, there are no +/- charges, it's just charge difference between two points.

Fact, everything that exist HAS A RESONANT frequency.

AND TIME DOESN'T EXIST? Then how can anything have a frequency?

Fact, everything that exist is made from +/- charges. I guess these guys don't know about chemistry?

They are poisoning minds with their telling people that are looking for the truth that time doesn't exist, and there is no +/- charges. Dielectric is a non conductive material, it's not the electric field. And counter space is really 2D space.

All of the above you need to understand to understand the aether. I'm calling a spade a spade, people using those terms are either ignorant or they are agents spreading disinformation.

And that's the real truth.

Click here to see my post "The Aether Defined"

Then watch one of Ken's video's on the aether. I'm really getting tired of people telling me I'm wrong and giving me a link to one of kin's video's on the aether.... He doesn't define it, I do!

End update 11/09/2021

I appreciate all feedback, if I have something wrong, please point it out to me and provide a source for what you are saying, and as you can see, providing me wrong with a video of Ken Wheeler, is not proof of anything.

Thank you

David Monroe

NOTE: added 11/19/2021 I am adding this video here for all those that are parroting "Time Doesn't Exist", and this post is not only for Ken, but for all those that are parroting these stupid ideas and wrong terms.

And I would also like to say that I am open to debate for anything I'm saying here. If I am using a wrong term, let me know, and if anything I'm saying can be proven wrong, then show me the evidence. But don't tell me I'm wrong and then give me a video from Ken and tell me he's right. I will be happy to point out where Ken is wrong in any video you give me, but a video from Ken is not proof that I am wrong about anything.

Time does exist in the universe, but the universe does not exist in time. I think these guys have it right. But to just keep on parroting time doesn't exist is moronic. Why would anyone believe anything someone has to say when they are saying time doesn't exist? If time did not exist then nothing would exist. STOP LISTENING TO THESE PEOPLE, they are not living in reality.

And one other thing I'd like to add here, toward the end of the video, he hits on dimensions, WOW, can't believe I heard him say it, it fits my view exactly, dimensions are size related. There is a hint to that from the bible, when it talks about the giants. Think about that, they may have been from a different dimension. The universe could be a part of something living, and it's been around a lot longer than any of us...... What I'm saying is that it will have an immune system that may see us as a cancer. The people on this planet need to wake up and do something about the corruption going on. Free energy will take this planet off the tract of destruction... It would salve all the problems energy production is causing on this planet.....

I can't believe I just found something else that I agree with 100%, the true meaning of dimensions is size related. Think about that, it adds up, it makes sense... Another mystery solved, thank you thunderbolts, you're using your heads.

Go to Understanding Tesla’s Stationary waves Scalar Energy: https://www.facebook.com/pg/TeslasScalarEnergyExplained/posts/

Note: I don't know what Facebook is doing but my page at the link above is no longer manageable. They used to have a way for me to see it like other do, but they have taken that away. They not only discontinued Notes on pages, but when they did, they deleted all the comments with them. Now they ended the ability to create documents in groups, that's why I'm moving everything to this website. They have made a complete mess of everything I was doing there, so you will run into links that take you to old notes from my page, and old documents from my group, but I managed to put links to the newest version of the post in them, you will just have to follow the links when you come to them. There was just no way I could change all the links that I have out there, eventually it will all be on this web site, so please bare with me.

Go to Tutorial Start Page: https://www.facebook.com/notes/understanding-teslas-stationary-waves-and-scalar-energy/tutorial-start-page/871168736614271/

NOTE 11/21/2021 I have found more evidence that Ken is misleading people intentionally. Rather than add it here I created a new page for it. He is quoting Tesla but he leaves something out that is very telling. I'm not sure that I will leave that on the menu so this may be the only way you can get to that post, CLICK HERE

Unique Visitors