Start paGE

Learning Starts Here

  To understand Tesla technology you are going to have to leave the realm of mainstream science, because they have done away with an aether, and tesla's technology should by all rights be called Aether Technology.

NOTE: 10/15/2021If you ,have been to this page before, make sure to refresh your browser as I am still adding information to this post. Thank you.

 

This is a doc in The Real Tesla Group Seeking the Truth not the Propaganda

Reposted and edited October 14/2021

 

The Aether Defined

David Monroe·Friday, October 9, 2020·

The words of Tesla:
"Nature has stored up in the universe infinite energy. The eternal recipient and transmitter of this infinite energy is the ether. The recognition of the existence of ether, and of the functions it performs, is one of the most important results of modern scientific research. The mere abandoning of the idea of action at a distance, the assumption of a medium pervading all space and connecting all gross matter, has freed the minds of thinkers of an ever present doubt, and, by opening a new horizon new and unforeseen possibilities has given fresh interest to phenomena with which we are familiar of old."

Note: (06/01/2021 He said this in 1891, and he didn't say will be one of the most important RESULTS of modern scientific research, HE SAID IT IS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT RESULTS. Yet he watched them do away with the aether. I think what Tesla discovered about the aether has been suppressed.)

In the 1890s, Tesla, was following Maxwell’s Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism and I can tell you that if you think Tesla was suppressed, that’s nothing compared to Maxwell, in fact what we call Maxwell’s equations are not Maxwell’s. He is the one that took everyone else’s work and unified it all into mathematical sense.

The subject of the aether, and just what it is, needs to be defined more than anything else. In fact, understanding the aether is critical to understand stationary waves, as they are an oscillation of/in the aether itself. Maxwell, doesn’t call it the aether, but he is saying the same thing as Tesla. What Maxwell wrote about this was published before his Treatise, and he even explains +/- charges as particles in vortices (spinns) which is also critical in understand stationary waves (now called standing waves).

Maxwell’s Original Equations
Frederick David Tombe,
Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom,
sirius184@hotmail.com
24th December 2011

"In Part I of his 1861 paper, Maxwell proposed the existence of a sea of
molecular vortices which are composed of a fluid-like aether"

Keep the above in mind while you continue below.

I have found information from a wealth of sources in an attempt to try and use the information that already exist to define these things that have yet to be properly defined. The answers are out there, but like it was for Maxwell, it’s scattered all around and needs to be in a coherent form.

The aether, from Tesla’s:
EXPERIMENTS WITH ALTERNATE CURRENTS OF VERY HIGH FREQUENCY AND THEIR APPLICATION TO METHODS OF ARTIFICIAL ILLUMINATION” Delivered before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, Columbia College, N.Y., May 20, 1891.

Quoting from this speech:

There is no subject more captivating, more worthy of study, than nature. To understand this great mechanism, to discover the forces which are active, and the laws which govern them, is the highest aim of the intellect of man.

 

Nature has stored up in the universe infinite energy. The eternal recipient and transmitter of this infinite energy is the ether. The recognition of the existence of ether, and of the functions it performs, "is"(* enphasis added) one of the most important results of modern scientific research. The mere abandoning of the idea of action at a distance, the assumption of a medium pervading all space and connecting all gross matter, has freed the minds of thinkers of an ever present doubt, and, by opening a new horizon new and unforeseen possibilities has given fresh interest to phenomena with which we are familiar of old. It has been a great step towards the understanding of the forces of nature and their multifold manifestations to our senses. It has been for the enlightened student of physics what the understanding of the mechanism of the firearm or of the steam engine is for the barbarian. Phenomena upon which we used to look as wonders baffling explanation, we now see in a different light. The spark of an induction coil, the glow of an incandescent lamp, the manifestations of the mechanical forces of currents and magnets are no longer beyond our grasp; instead of the incomprehensible, as before, their observation suggests now in our minds a simple mechanism, and although as to its precise nature all is still conjecture, yet we know that the truth cannot be much longer hidden, and instinctively we feel that the understanding is dawning upon us. We still admire these beautiful phenomena, these strange forces, but we are helpless no longer; we can in a certain measure explain them, account for them, and we are hopeful of finally succeeding in unraveling the mystery which surrounds them.

 

In how far we can understand the world around us is the ultimate thought of every student of nature. The coarseness of our senses prevents us from recognizing the ulterior construction of matter, and astronomy, this grandest and most positive of natural sciences, can only teach us something that happens, as it were, in our immediate neighborhood; of the remoter portions of the boundless universe, with its numberless stars and suns, we know nothing, But far beyond the limit of perception of our senses the spirit still can guide us, and so we may hope that even these unknown worlds infinitely small and great may in a measure became known to us. Still, even if this knowledge should reach us, the searching mind will find a barrier, perhaps forever unsurpassable, to the true recognition of that which seems to be, the mere appearance of which is the only and slender basis of all our philosophy.

 

Of all the forms of nature's immeasurable, all-pervading energy, which ever and ever changing and moving; like a soul animates the inert universe, electricity and magnetism are perhaps the most fascinating. The effects of gravitation, of heat and light we observe daily, and soon we get accustomed to them, and soon they lose for us the character of the marvelous and wonderful; but electricity and magnetism, with their singular relationship, with their seemingly dual character, unique among the forces in nature, with their phenomena of attractions, repulsions "and rotations"(*), strange manifestations of mysterious agents; stimulate and excite the mind to thought and research. What is electricity, and what is magnetism? These questions have been asked again and again. The most able intellects have ceaselessly wrestled with the problem; still the question has not as yet been fully answered. But while we cannot even to-day state "what these singular forces are"(*), we have made good headway towards the solution of the problem. We are now confident that electric and magnetic phenomena are attributable to ether, and we are perhaps justified in saying that the effects of static electricity are effects of ether under strain, and those of dynamic electricity and electro-magnetism effects of ether in motion. But this still leaves the question, as to what electricity and magnetism are, unanswered.

 

First, we naturally inquire, What is electricity, and is there such a thing as electricity? In interpreting electric phenomena: we may speak of electricity or of an electric condition, state or effect. "If we speak of electric effects we must distinguish two such effects, opposite in character and neutralizing each other, as observation shows that two such opposite effects exist"(*). This is unavoidable, for in a medium of the properties of ether, we cannot possibly exert a strain, or produce a displacement or motion of any kind, without causing in the surrounding medium an equivalent and opposite effect.

NOTE: See my deffention for electric and magnetic fields in “The list of Proper Terms Defined” (still under construction at this time).

But if we speak of electricity, meaning a thing, "we must, I think, abandon the idea of two electricities, as the existence of two such things is highly improbable"(*). For "how can we imagine that there should be two things, equivalent in amount, alike in their properties, but of opposite character, both clinging to matter, both attracting and completely neutralizing each other"(*)? Such an assumption, though suggested by many phenomena, though most convenient for explaining them, has little to commend it. If there is such a thing as electricity, there can be only one such thing, and; excess and want of that one thin, possibly; "but more probably its condition determines the positive and negative character"(*). The old theory of Franklin, though falling short in some respects; is, from a certain point of view, after all, the most plausible one. Still, in spite of this, the theory of the two electricities is generally accepted, as it apparently explains electric phenomena in a more satisfactory manner. But a theory which better explains the facts is not necessarily true. Ingenious minds will invent theories to suit observation, and almost every independent thinker has his own views on the subject.

Note: 02/20/2021 Added links below for Dr. Lodge and Prof. Rowland

It is not with the, object of advancing an opinion; but with the desire of acquainting you better with some of the results, which I will describe, to show you the reasoning I have followed, the departures I have made that I venture to express, in a few words, the views and convictions which have led me to these results.

 

I adhere to the idea that there is a thing which we have been in the habit of calling electricity. The question is, What is that thing? or, What, of all things, the existence of which we know, have we the best reason to call electricity? We know that it acts like an incompressible fluid; that there must be a constant quantity of it in nature; that it can be neither produced nor destroyed; and, "what is more important, the electro-magnetic theory of light and all facts observed teach us that electric and ether phenomena are identical"(*). The idea at once suggests itself, therefore, that electricity might be called ether. In fact, this view has in a certain sense been advanced by Dr. Lodge. His interesting work has been read by everyone and many have been convinced by his arguments. His great ability and the interesting nature of the subject, keep the reader spellbound; but when the impressions fade, one realizes that he has to deal only with ingenious explanations. "I must confess, that I cannot believe in two electricities"(*), much less in a doubly-constituted ether. The puzzling behavior of the ether as a solid waves of light anti heat, and as a fluid to the motion of bodies through it, is certainly explained in the most natural and satisfactory manner by assuming it to be in motion, as Sir William Thomson has suggested; but regardless of this, there is nothing which would enable us to conclude with certainty that, while a fluid is not capable of transmitting transverse vibrations of a few hundred or thousand per second, it might not be capable of transmitting such vibrations when they range into hundreds of million millions per second. Nor can anyone prove that there are transverse ether waves emitted from an alternate current machine, giving a small number of alternations per second; to such slow disturbances, the ether, if at rest, may behave as a true fluid.

 

"Returning to the subject, and bearing in mind that the existence of two electricities is, to say the least, highly improbable"(* emphasis added), we must remember, that we have no evidence of electricity, nor can we hope to get it, unless gross matter is present. Electricity, therefore, cannot be called ether in the broad sense of the term; "but nothing would seem to stand in the way of calling electricity ether associated with matter"(*), or bound other; or, in other words, that the so-called static charge of the molecule is ether associated in some way with the molecule. Looking at it in that light, we would be justified in saying, that electricity is concerned in all molecular actions.

NOTE: Electricity is aether associated with matter.

Now, precisely what the ether surrounding the molecules is, wherein it differs from ether in general, can only be conjectured. It cannot differ in density, ether being incompressible; it must, therefore, be under some strain or is motion, and the latter is the most probable. To understand its functions, it would be necessary to have an exact idea of the physical construction of matter, of which, of course, we can only form a mental picture.

 

"But of all the views on nature, the one which assumes one matter and one force, and a perfect uniformity throughout, is the most scientific and most likely to be true"(*). An infinitesimal world, with the molecules and their atoms spinning and moving in orbits, in much the same manner as celestial bodies, carrying with them and probably spinning with them ether, or in other words; carrying with them static charges, seems to my mind the most probable view, and one which, in a plausible manner, accounts for most of the phenomena observed. The spinning of the molecules and their ether sets up the ether tensions or electrostatic strains; the equalization of ether tensions sets up ether motions or electric currents, and the orbital movements produce the effects of electro and permanent magnetism

 

"About fifteen, years ago, Prof. Rowland demonstrated a most interesting and important fact; namely, that a static charge carried around produces the effects of an electric current. Leaving out of consideration the precise nature of the mechanism, which produces the attraction and repulsion of currents, and conceiving the electrostatically charged molecules in motion, this experimental fact gives us a fair idea of magnetism. We can conceive lines or tubes of force which physically exist, being formed of rows of directed moving molecules; we can see that these lines must be closed, that they must tend to shorten and expand, etc. It likewise explains in a reasonable way, the most puzzling phenomenon of all, permanent magnetism, and, in general, has all the beauties of the Ampere theory without possessing the vital defect of the same, namely, the assumption of molecular currents. Without enlarging further upon the subject, I would say, that I look upon all electrostatic, current and magnetic phenomena as being due to electrostatic molecular forces.

 

The preceding remarks I have deemed necessary to a full understanding; of the subject as it presents itself to my mind.

 

Of all these phenomena the most important to study are the current phenomena, on account of the already extensive and ever-growing use of currents for industrial purposes. It is now a century since the first practical source of current was produced, and, ever since, the phenomena which accompany the flow of currents have been diligently studied, and through the untiring efforts of scientific men the simple laws which govern them have been discovered. But these laws are found to hold good only when the currents are of a steady character. When the currents are rapidly varying in strength, quite different phenomena, often unexpected, present themselves, and quite different laws hold good, which even now have not been determined as fully as is desirable, though through the work, principally, of English scientists, enough knowledge has been gained on the subject to enable us to treat simple cases which now present themselves in daily practice."(*) Note: There is no doubt in my mind that what he is tallking about here, is what we call today microwave theory. And here we go with proper terms again, I think microwave theory should just be called wave theory, as all waves act in like manner. Tesla is the father of microwave theory, he shure understood the principles of wave superposition, that's for sure..... It's in his patents!

Wow, there is a lot being said there!

Click here Link 01 for the source for this information.
******* End The Quote from the link above *********

For more quotes from Tesla about the aether see: The discovery of Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter - part 3

 

I increased the size of the last 3 parigraphs for  emphasis (*) because there is a lot to digest there. But all thru it I emphasized the parts where he is talking about two electisities for a reason. I believe he is talking about what Maxwell put forth, two particles spinning in opostite directions one from another. There is no difference between a positive or a negative charge, other than their spin. In a neutino it's a poitive and a negative charge that makes it charge neutial. This is the buildong blocks of all matter.

I have heard that Wal Thornhill from The Thunderbolts Project has stated that he believes the aether is neutrino’s, but I haven’t found the source material for him saying that.

 

Update, 10/15/2021 this is from the Thunderbolts website:

"Both sorts of transmission are effected by the dipolar electric distortion of the subtronic orbits of the neutrinos which, it is proposed, are thinly but universally distributed through space, making up the aether that is the medium of transmission."

So they do support neutrinos as being the aether, and it apears also that they spell it aether. Now just what they think the neutrinos are made from is another story, but if you read the above post from their site they do apear to believe it is made from matter (particles)

Update,10/15/2021 this is from another post at The Thunderbolts site site:

"Thornhill proposes that the “aether” of space consists principally of neutrinos. Neutrinos are understood to be fundamental particles of vanishingly small mass (much smaller than the mass of an electron) and no charge. However, in the Electric Universe paradigm, and following the proposal of Ralph Sansbury, all fundamental particles consist of subtrons orbiting in a resonant manner that are positively and negatively charged, and whose total charges sum to the charge of the particle. In the case of the neutrino the positive and negative charges of the subtrons sum to zero."

And they do support neutrinos are made from two particles in oscillation with each other. I am just now finding this out, and we are in agreement on what the aethewr is. Just follow on below for more on this. End update 10/15/2021

I have found something else that may support what I am thinking. It may even give us some clues into what these two electricities was that Tesla was talking about, and if I am correct it would substantiate what Tesla was speaking about being against, and that is two electricities, and you have to remember that this was before the electron was even discovered.

 

What I am talking about is +/- charges. It is all the same thing just different spins. If you had one particle spinning in one direction and another one spinning in the opposite direction, they would lock on to each other and create a neutrino, meaning their charges would cancel each other out. This may be what Wal is calling a neutrino? In my mind we are talking about the smallest unit of charge, a charge CARRIER.

 

The principles of wave superposition are so simple, all waves add together, period. You have the smallest unit charge, one in a spin that we call positive and another one spinning in the opposite direction that we call negative, sitting there ready to add a + or a - charge to it. The aether is the perfict carrier.....  

 

And what did Tesla say at the start of that?

"Nature has stored up in the universe infinite energy. The eternal recipient and transmitter of this infinite energy is the ether."

Below you are going to see the references that agree with this thinking. I think we are doing a good job at defining the aether   

Please watch the  short video of an experiment with cylinders spinning in water. When they are spinning in opposite directions, they attract each other, but when spinning in the same direction, they repel each other.  Refference matterial: How does the Electric Field create a force? 

 
 
 

 

Below is a video on electron spin from The Royal Institution. Pay close attention to what he is saying between 9 and 10 minutes into the video Note: Link added 05/25/2020

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

But how are they bound together?


The Aether as a 1/2 wavelength Standing Wave.

Standing waves are made from two transverse waves traveling in opposite directions. Which means that they still have the magnetic field that can be expressed. This makes them the perfect carrier wave. It’s the principles of wave superposition that the two of them mixed (added) together makes them stationary (standing). This is what they must be, to be conducive for electromagnetic waves to travel thru.

Now, if you consider that a standing wave of a 1/2 a wavelength known as the fundamental frequency or the 1st harmonic is a 1/2 a wavelength oscillating between a +/- charge. What we now call an electron is a standing wave of 1 wavelength, that is the 1st and 2nd harmonic locked together 180 deg out of phase. This is the stuff that all matter comes from. If our model of the electron is one wavelength, and this has been proven, then the first element on the periodic table is a - and + charge oscillating back and forth. Remember that below is a 2D representation of something that is a spiral in 3D.

 

This is a standing wave of 1 wavelength and that is currently the model of the electron, remember, this is a 2D representation of something that is a spiral in 3D.

NOTE: It looks like the images are not coming out in the right order when viewed from a cellphone. I will try to fix that, but I have a lot going on right now so from below this point it's best viewed on a computer.

 

  Below is an animation of the model of the electron, which is a standing wave of 1 wavelength, the 1st and 2nd harmonic... Now each molecule is just adding another “electron and proton” but that is really just another electron of 1 wavelength. Add another “electron” 1 wavelength, and you have the next molecule.

StandingWave1lambda - Copy.gif

We need some terms reevaluated. What we now call an electron should be called two aetherion's and an aetherion is made from two particle of opposite spin,  one called and electron and the other called a positron. Those should be called a - ion and a + prion. They can both be photons. When locked together they are an aetherion. 

 

You can now tack on one particle (-) from1/2 a wavelength standing wave, and we say it is now negatively charged. The other particle (+) would be given off as a photon.

This is a 1/2 wavelength standing wave and we are looking at it in 2D, but it is still a spiral in 3D.

StandingWave1lambda_23.gif

Below is a 3D images. And let me remind you what Tesla said his most favored thing was the discovery of THE ROTATING MAGNETIC FIELD. That's what you are looking at below.

dna.gif

 

What I am going to be putting forth here is that the aether is 1/2 wavelength standing waves that is really a +/- charge locked together and neutral for the most part, until it gets attached to another 1/2 a wavelength OR MORE. This lives up to Tesla’s it being one thing, not two different electricity's. And when you get down to the nitty gritty of it, it’s just two particles with opposite spins. break the “neutron” apart, and you have two particles with opposite spins, or a + positron and a - ion (the - ion freed from the + positron/proton). they are all the same thing, they just have opposite spins one from another. Now Tesla was a very intuitive person, and we just didn’t have the knowledge back then that we have today. Could this be what he was alluding to?

We will now get into my resource for the idea of the electron positron flood being the aether. That is to say a flood of +/- charges locked together.... we do know that opposites attract. What I’m saying is that I think Tesla was right, it’s all the same thing, just two different spins, and this is supported by the known science of today.

Next I’d like to look an The Electron-Positron Sea
(The Electric Sea) by Frederick David Tombe, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom, sirius184@hotmail.com 23rd April 2014 Click here on Link 04 for the complete paper.

From the link:

“Abstract. It is proposed that all space is permeated with a dense electrically neutral sea of electrons and positrons which serves as the medium for the propagation of light. The challenge remains to devise a stable bonding mechanism within this luminiferous medium that conforms with Maxwell’s equations by providing the necessary solidity and the physical mechanism that will give rise to the characteristics of electromagnetic waves, while at the same time allowing for the fluidity that would avoid the problem of friction in the planetary orbits.”

Now I’ll give you the conclusion:

“Conclusion VIII. The cylindrical symmetry of the rotating electron-positron dipoles is the key to the luminiferous medium being solid enough to sustain transverse waves while being fluid enough to avoid friction in planetary motion. Ampère’s Circuital Law is the basis upon which moving objects always cause the electron-positron dipoles to align so as to cause centrifugal force as opposed to friction. This is in contrast to Simhony’s cubic lattice solution which would not readily permit shearing, and hence would not allow for the passage of atomic and molecular matter. Simhony’s electron-positron cubic lattice is like a block of electric ice which would freeze the planets in their orbits.”

Now lets compare some images.

 
86497966_952110018520142_8796912832680558592_o.jpg
 

This one is from The Electron-Positron Sea (The Electric Sea) "Fig. 1. A single magnetic line of force.The electrons are shown in red and the positrons are shown in black. The double helix is rotating about its axis with a circumferential speed equal to the speed of light, and the rotation axis represents the magnetic field vectorH.

Do you see any similarities in these two images? If you noticed in the one with the red and black dots, where the lines cross they go from red to black every other one, that’s because this is a 2D picture of something that is 3D

Compare the 3rd and 4th Harmonic with the picture above.

a 2D image of a 3D object. The writer of that information must have seen these +/- charges as taking on a DNA like spiral and that is what standing waves are, a spiral tunnel like tube. And indeed that is what the early researchers in electricity were saying.

New information recently discovered shows this double strand helical shape found thru out space. See The Thunderbolts Project recent video Click here

standing.gif

Note: will add video into this page later

I originally thought the aether was standing waves, then I started researching the aether more and thought I was originally wrong, and in a way I was right, I just had the scaling wrong. I find the theory of the Electron Positron Sea the most logical explanation as to what the aether is at this time.

Look at it like space is filled with particles of the smallest particles possible locked together, setting there neutral in charge, but as soon as a field comes at it, it polarizes a mirror image of the field. This would satisfy the requirement for a medium that would allow waves to pass thru it. Are they strung along like tubes that create the force that we know as electricity, or are they just the smallest independent standing waves packed in as close as they can get? Maybe someday we will find that answer?

 

I believe wave theory will be the unified field theory, as everything that exist is waves. The most promising properties of standing waves are their ability to move energy without a magnetic field, they are scalar energy. I do believe that Tesla was also right, that standing waves are filling all of space and this model of the Electron Positron Sea fulfills the requirements for an aether. An aether that is a double helix spiral (vortex).

I will be spending more time on The List of Proper Terms Defined as this note is going to become a part of that, along with my last post, Scalar Energy and Scalar Waves Defined. Links to that post as well as this one will be put in The List of Proper Terms Defined.

Other resources:

Proof that Maxwell believed in particles were assoceated with electricity.
Note: (This is what I was looking for from Maxwell, he just isn’t calling it aether added 03/14/2020)

Maxwell On Physical Lines of Force 1861

Did Tesla believe particles were associated with electricity? Here is proof he did.

 

The List of Proper Terms Defined Note: See my additional note under Proton as it pertains to this note and how they are the same thing as an electron.

THE AETHER "The material universe is purely made out of aether." Note: Make sure to check the other links at the bottom of that page at this site

Two Electrivities

Types of Electricity - Modern Methods

More to be added: I will be adding more here on how these 1/2 wavelength standing waves would fill all of space, but at this time it’s not critical for understanding what the aether is. This post is already longer than it should be so I may condense some of the above, or I may just do a separate note? What research I have done on that looks like chemistry would give us some good examples.

Is this going to be another coincidence, that both the aether and standing waves appear to take on a DNA form? I really had no idea that is where this would go, and I am only following other information out there and this is where it leads us. I’m thinking more and more of doing a post on the list of coincidences. Something to think about anyway.


Note: I have started working on The List of Coincidences, however, because I go by inspiration I don’t know at this time how long it will be before I post that information and I will be doing a separate post, a Part 2 of The Aether Defined.03/12/2020

 

Thank you for your interest.
David Monroe

*********************************
***** Tutorial Link Below ********

Link to Tutorial Start Page Click Here

Link back to The List of Proper Terms Defined

******************************************************
**********List of Links in this note below ***************

Link 01 https://www.lab-tesla.org/aiee1891.html

Link 02 https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/uploads/articles/StandingWave1lambda.gif

Link 03 https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/uploads/articles/StandingWave1lambda_23.gif

Link 04 https://www.facebook.com/groups/therealteslagroup/permalink/1012805025787582/

Link 05 https://youtu.be/HBXVoztxyhs

Link o6 https://youtu.be/S3xH97Su-KY

Link 07

Link to Tutorial Start Page https://www.facebook.com/notes/understanding-teslas-stationary-waves-and-scalar-energy/tutorial-start-page/871168736614271/

 

Link Back to The List of Proper Terms Defined: https://www.facebook.com/notes/understanding-teslas-stationary-waves-and-scalar-energy/the-list-of-proper-terms-defined/888913788173099/

 

Proof that Maxwell believed in particle associated with electicity: http://vacuum-physics.com/Maxwell/maxwell_oplf.pdf?fbclid=IwAR30wJOt66FCejfOg9tgNFtb2LDoH2XDSqlT83zIYvE8tK1joJBjy51leGY

 

Did Tesla believe particles were ass0ociated with electricity? Here is proof he did. https://www.facebook.com/groups/therealteslagroup/?multi_permalinks=1039367913131293&notif_id=1584162840359381&notif_t=feedback_reaction_generic

The List of Proper Terms Defined: https://www.facebook.com/notes/understanding-teslas-stationary-waves-and-scalar-energy/the-list-of-proper-terms-defined/88891378817309

THE AETHER "The material universe is purely made out of aether." http://www.rhythmodynamics.com/Gabriel_LaFreniere/sa_aether.htm

Two Electricities: https://spiralperiodictable.com/2010/11/15/the-two-kinds-of-electricity-are-static-and-current/

 

Types of Electricity - Modern Methods: https://www.electricityforum.com/types-electricity.html

The discovery of Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter - part 3: https://steemit.com/history/@mage00000/the-discovery-of-tesla-s-magnifying-transmitter-part-3

David Monroe: https://www.facebook.com/DavNXS

Note: Oct 23/2020 I had to copy this over to a document in the group, from my page, because facebook was ending notes on pages, and after Oct 31/2020 I would not be able to edit any notes. Everything I am doing here is a work in progress. Some of the formatting was lost in the transfer. It was mostly just bold text, but I had somethings bold for a reason. Please be patient while I try to get these notes, now called documents, back the way I had them.
Thank you

 

I'm a paragraph. Click here to add your own text and edit me. It's easy.

.

​​​

I'm a paragraph. Click here to add your own text and edit me. It's easy.