6 Is it just a coincidence that I can demonstrate using the wave on a string app what Stan Meyers said about his voltage intensifier circuit, that the voltage would rise to infinity, limited only by the equipment?

​

This is probably one of the most important things to understand about Tesla's wireless system, and how, and where, the extra energy comes from. It's in his patents, to drive the transformer with a 1/4 wavelength. What that means is the frequency you choose to use has to be a harmonic of earths natural frequency plus 1/4 wavelength. That is also what you need for a standing wave to form on a wire that has no termination, an open end has to end with 1/4 or a 3/4 wavelength. In sound, it would be like a wind instrument, an open end.

 

But we are just going to use easy numbers here, CLICK HERE for an online frequency wavelength calculator.

Go to it and enter 10 MHz, leave everything else at default and hit Calculate.

The frequency wavelength for 10 MHz is 98.4 feet.  

 

Now change it to a 1/4 wavelength and hit calculate.

A 1/4 wavelength for 10 MHz is 24.6 feet

You want to use 24.6 foot of wire for your coil.

There is more to it, but I just want you to understand  that the frequency wavelength for 10 MHz 98.4 feet, so you would use 24.6 feet of wire for a coil. This is what enables the additional gain in the transformer thru the principles of wave superposition and constructive interference.

 

What this means is that the input is going to reflect at a 1/4 of the wavelength of the frequency you are putting in, and again at 1/2 a wavelength, then again at a 3/4 wavelength, and each time it reflects, it's going to add to the standing wave the amount of power you are driving it with. So let's say you have 30 volts on the input, each time it reflects the voltage will increase by 30 volts. So when it hits 1/4 wavelength and reflects back it will now be 60 volts, at 1/2 a wavelength it is going to reflect again making it 90 volts, then at 3/4 wavelength it reflects one more time making it now 120 volts. So at 30 volts input, in one cycle you end up with 120 volts. That's 120 volts per cycle of the 30 volts input, and your voltage is going to increase 120 volts for each cycle.  

 

This is why the voltage input will have to be decreased to maintain the voltage you want it to be at. The input drive will drop to a level to make up for the loses in the system.      

 

Now read what Tesla said: 

 

"The following is from "Comparative Study of the Hertz, Marconi and Tesla Low-Frequency Wireless Systems"

"Now, there is a vast difference between these two, the electromagnetic and current energies. That energy which goes out in the form of rays, is, as I have indicated here, unrecoverable, hopelessly lost. You can operate a little instrument by catching a billionth part of it but, except this, all goes out into space never to return. This other energy, however, of the current in the globe, is stored and completely recoverable. Theoretically, it does not take much effort to maintain the earth in electrical vibration. I have, in fact, worked out a plant of 10,000 horsepower which would operate with no bigger loss than 1 percent of the whole power applied; that is, with the exception of the frictional energy that is consumed in the rotation of the engines and the heating of the conductors, I would not lose more than 1 percent. In other words, if I have a 10,000 horsepower plant, it would take only 100 horsepower to keep the earth vibrating so long as there is no energy taken out at any other place. [NT on AC, p. 140]"

​

This is showing what Stan Meyers meant when he said in his VIC (Voltage Intensifier Circuit) when he said that the voltage would increase to infinity, limited only by the equipment. And this is the reason he would only have to use 100 horsepower to maintain the standing wave of 10,000 horsepower. The wave on a string apps dampening setting only works with 10% adjustments, or I would run this at 1% in the demonstration. But let me remind you that from the statement he made above where he says "as long as there is no energy being taken out at any other place" is because that system only has to put in any losses, unlike our system being used today.... What he doesn't say in the above statement is that the power he puts into the system still has a 6 dB gain of the input power per cycle. So his system only has to put in the energy being lost or used BECAUSE THE ENERGY IS BEING STORED IN THE EARTH/STANDING WAVE.

​

So the video below is a demonstration of what he says above, and for what Stan Meyers said, as well as for the statements I've made about once his system reached the voltage you want the input power would drop to a level only to make up for the losses in the system.... So it only has to put in the energy lost or used.

    ?